Stability classification of rock slopes along a highway in Mentougou, Beijing
GUO Songfeng1, QI Shengwen1, LI Xingxing1, ZOU Yu1, LIAO Haijun2, ZHANG Shishu3
1. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China; 2. Beijing Institute of Geology, Beijing 100120, China; 3. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu 610072, China
Abstract：The rock slopes, along a highway in Mentougou, Beijing, have characteristics as follows: huge amounts of 113, complicated influencing factors, large difficulty to gain mechanical parameters of all slopes, so it is hard to investigate the mechanical properties for large member of slopes. Analytic multilayer process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation are used to classify the slope stability in this paper. Two-layer and four primary influencing factors including nine secondary influencing factors are chosen to evaluate the slope stability according to the influencing factors of slope stability. Firstly, the stability classification is divided into 4 grades: stable, basically stable, less unstable, and unstable. Secondly, membership matrix and weight matrix are constructed. Lastly, stability of every slope is classified by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The results indicate that the number of unstable slopes is 3, 3% of all slopes; the number of less unstable slopes is 27, 24% of all slopes; the number of basically stable slopes is 52, 46% of all slopes; the number of stable slopes is 31, 27% of all slopes. If the number of slopes is huge, boundary conditions are not clear and influencing factors are complicated, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is an eligible method. It should be noted that the validity of the maximum subordination principle should be evaluated based on the effect of every factors on slope stability in case the evaluation fails.
[1] Fellenius W.Calculation of the stability of earth dams[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd Congress on Large Dams.Washington DC,USA:Government Printing Office,1936. [2] Bishop A W.The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis ofslopes[J].Géotechnique,1955,5(1):7-17. [3] Morgenstern N R,Price V E.The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces[J].Géotechnique,1965,15(1):79-93. [4] Janbu N.Slope stability computations[R].Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Report.Trondheim,Norway:Technical University of Norway,1968. [5] Sarma S K.Stability analysis of embankments and slopes[J].Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division,1979,105(12):1511-1524. [6] Griffiths D V.Finite element analyses of walls,footings and slopes[D].Manchester:University of Manchester,1980. [7] Griffiths D V,Lane P A.Slope stability analysis by finite elements[J].Géotechnique,1999,49(3):387-403. [8] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,邓卫东.用有限元强度折减法进行节理岩质边坡稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(2):254-260. [9] 任青文,余天堂.边坡稳定的块体单元法分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(1):20-24. [10] 谢全敏,夏元友.岩体边坡治理决策的模糊层次分析方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(7):1117-1120. [11] 黄建文,李建林,周宜红.基于AHP的模糊评判法在边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(增刊):2627-2632. [12] 孟衡.模糊数学在岩质边坡稳定性分析中的应用[J].岩土工程技术,2008,22(4):178-181. [13] 张勇慧,李红旭,盛谦,等.基于模糊综合评判的公路岩质边坡稳定性分级研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(10):3151-3156. [14] Saaty T L.A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J].Journal of Mathematical Psychology,1977,15(3):234-281. [15] Saaty T L,Wong M M.Projecting average family size in rural India by the analytic hierarchy process[J].The Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1983,9(3):181-209. [16] 冯希杰,刘玉海,张骏.区域稳定性评价定量化与模糊评判[J].西安地质学院学报,1986,8(4):89-95. [17] 聂洪峰,祁生文,孙进忠,等.重庆市区域稳定性层次分析模糊综合评价[J].工程地质学报,2002,10(4):408-414. [18] 陈耀辉,孙春燕.模糊综合评判法中的最大隶属度原则有效度[J].重庆师范学院学报(自然科学版),2001,18(1):45-47. [19] 陈耀辉,孙春燕.对最大隶属原则有效度的进一步研究[J].重庆师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,19(1):47-49.
2016, Vol. 3 
