岩土体综合导热系数影响因素研究

doi:10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2018.01.13

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1560 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract In order to alleviate the contradiction between energy consumption and economic development in China, and adjust the national energy structure effectively, the government vigorously encourages to develop and use the green geothermal energy. Through the indoor test method and on-site thermal response experiment, the authors summarized the thermal conductivity characteristics and the influencing factors for different rock and soil. The results show that the thermal conductivity is in negative correlation with natural moisture content and porosity, and in positive correlation with natural weight and drying weight. The thermal conductivity is more affected by drying weight and porosity, and less affected by natural moisture content and natural weight. Through comparing the difference between the heating power and the thermal conductivity for the single and double U ground heat exchangers, the authors summarized that the comprehensive thermal conductivity of rock and soil in high power (6 000 W) is 10%~30% higher than that in low power (4 000 W). In the same power condition and the same site, the thermal conductivity for double U ground heat exchanger is about 30% higher than that for the single U ground heat exchanger. The utilization of double U ground heat exchanger can effectively reduce the hole depth and quantity. Through systematically analyzing the influencing factors of thermal conductivity of rock and soil, this paper provides statistical and theoretical support for geothermal energy exploration and evaluation. The results could promote the development and utilization of regional geothermal energy and be used for the construction of environment-friendly society.

Key words： rock and soil thermal conductivity influencing factors geothermal energy thermal property test

Received: 30 June 2017

ZTFLH:

P314

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Yang
	ZHANG Hui
	GUI Zhongqiang
	WANG Ke
	ZHANG Yage

Cite this article:

ZHOU Yang,ZHANG Hui,GUI Zhongqiang, et al. Study on influencing factors of comprehensive thermal conductivity of rock and soil[J]. , 2018, 5(1): 89-94.

URL:

http://www.zgdzdcbjb.com/EN/10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2018.01.13 OR http://www.zgdzdcbjb.com/EN/Y2018/V5/I1/89

[1] 周阳,邓念东,王凤,等.浅层地热能适宜性分区结构的分形原理[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(1):18-23.
[2] 王贵玲,蔺文静,张薇.我国主要城市浅层地温能利用潜力评价[J].建筑科学,2012,28(10):1-3,8.
[3] 蔺文静,刘志明,王婉丽,等.中国地热资源及其潜力评估[J].中国地质,2013,40(1):312-321.
[4] 卫万顺,郑桂森,栾英波.北京平原区浅层地温场特征及其影响因素研究[J].中国地质,2010,37(6):1733-1739.
[5] YavuzturkC,Chiasson AD.Performance analysis of U-tube,concentric tube,and standing column well ground heat exchangers using a system simulation approach[J].ASHRAE Transactions,2002,108(1):925-938.
[6] Lund J,Sanner B,Rybach L,et al.Geothermal(ground-source) heat pumps:A world overview[J].Geo-Heat Center Bulletin,2004,25(3):1-10.
[7] John W L.Direct utilization of geothermal energy[J].Energies,2010,3(8):1443-1471.
[8] 栾英波,郑桂森,卫万顺.北京平原区粉质粘土热导率影响因素实验研究[J].中国地质,2013,40(3):981-988.
[9] 胡静,涂良权,刘会平.河南省九龙山汤池温泉地热地质特征及成因机制[J].地质科技情报,2012,31(4):86-90.
[10] 陈晓冬,金旭,管彦武,等.长春地区地表温度日变、年变对地温测量的影响[J].地球物理学进展,2006,21(3):1008-1011.
[11] 冯超臣,黄文峰.山东省菏泽市聊城—兰考断裂带西部地区地热资源评价[J].中国地质调查,2015,2(8):55-59.
[12] 赵振,于漂罗,陈惠娟,等.青海省西宁地热田成因分析及资源评价[J].中国地质,2015,42(3):803-810.
[13] 李攻科,王卫星,李宏,等.河北汤泉地热田地温场分布及其控制因素研究[J].中国地质,2014,41(6):2099-2109.
[14] 徐明,赵平,朱传庆,等.江汉盆地钻井地温测量和大地热流分布[J].地质科学,2010,45(1):317-323.
[15] 刘鹏,阎长虹,徐杨,等.南京地区下蜀土导热系数影响因素室内试验研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2016,36(5):847-852.
[16] 李少华,秦祥熙,牛定辉,等.现场热响应试验测定导热系数的影响因素分析[J].暖通空调,2015,45(12):49-52.
[17] 周阳,李锋,闫文中,等.关中盆地主要城市浅层地热能资源量赋存规律研究[J].中国地质调查,2016,3(4):12-18.
[18] 胡圣标,何丽娟,汪集旸.中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第三版)[J].地球物理学报,2011,44(5):611-626.
[19] 李守巨,范永思,张德岗,等.岩土材料导热系数与孔隙率关系的数值模拟分析[J].岩土力学,2007,28(增刊1):244-248.