山西隆起区燕山期构造变形特征

doi:10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2019.02.07

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (10502 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract During Yanshann movement period, the contractive structure deformation of the thrust fault and buckling folds formed as the basic structural elements is shown in Shanxi uplift area. Strata of different ages in this area have unique rock assemblage and physical properties, which may preserve and record deformation styles and characteristics at different levels of Yanshan structure. Through the study of surface geology, physiognomy and structure characteristics, we primarily concluded the “delaminate contractive deformation, and vertical stacking and thickening” structure mode. The balanced section method was applied to quantitatively estimate the horizontal shortening and vertical thickening effect, which were caused by nearly E-W shrinkage deformation. The section restoration showed that, before and after deformation, the horizontal shortening of the uplift area was about 32.8% in total. Cambrian bottom unconformity interface in the uplift area is about 5 km higher than that in Ordos Basin, due to vertical thickening. The intensive collision uplift and folding deformation resulted in the lateral shortening and vertical thickening in the upper part of the crust. Geological bodies are orderly vertically stacked and different levels of tectonic trace have shown great changes in spatial positions. Current spatial distribution of surface geological bodies, differences between northern and southern fold combination style and the along-the-trend segmentation of fracture all demonstrate the vertical stratification of tectonic deformation, due to late uplift and the difference of denudation degree on the surface.

Key words： Yanshan movement structural model balanced section Shanxi uplift area

Received: 28 December 2018

ZTFLH:

P542

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Kang
	WEI Rongzhu
	XU Shichao

Cite this article:

LIU Kang,WEI Rongzhu,XU Shichao. Structure deformation characteristics of Shanxi uplift area during Yanshan movement period[J]. , 2019, 6(2): 58-67.

URL:

http://www.zgdzdcbjb.com/EN/10.19388/j.zgdzdc.2019.02.07 OR http://www.zgdzdcbjb.com/EN/Y2019/V6/I2/58

[1] 山西省地质矿产局.山西省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1989:315-340.
[2] 郑德顺. 华北地区中、新生代地形倒转过程及其动力学机制研究[D].上海:同济大学,2008.
[3] 魏荣珠,李好斌,徐朝雷,等.对山西隆起区中新生代构造演化的认识[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(1):24-34.
[4] 葛肖虹,刘俊来,任收麦,等.中国东部中-新生代大陆构造的形成与演化[J].中国地质,2014,41(1):19-38.
[5] 王鸿祯,刘本培,李思田.中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段[M]//王鸿祯.中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990:3-34.
[6] 刘池洋,赵红格,桂小军,等.鄂尔多斯盆地演化-改造的时空坐标及其成藏(矿)响应[J].地质学报,2006,80(5):617-638.
[7] 张抗. 鄂尔多斯断块构造和资源[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1989:1-394.
[8] 赵重远,刘池洋.华北克拉通沉积盆地形成与演化及其油气赋存[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1990:1-189.
[9] 张岳桥,廖昌珍.晚中生代—新生代构造体制转换与鄂尔多斯盆地改造[J].中国地质,2006,33(1):28-40.
[10] 廖昌珍,张岳桥,温长顺.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘边界带构造样式及其区域构造意义[J].地质学报,2007,81(4):466-474.
[11] 庆建春,季建清,王金铎,等.五台山新生代隆升剥露的磷灰石裂变径迹研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,51(2):384-392.
[12] 徐杰,高战武,宋长青,等.太行山山前断裂带的构造特征[J].地震地质,2000,22(2):111-122.
[13] 王润福. 山西人文地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2013:77-79.
[14] 吴奇,李三忠,刘鑫,等.山西南部燕山期类隔挡式褶皱构造特征[J].大地构造与成矿学,2012,36(4):483-489.
[15] 张兆琪. 地震与构造[M].太原:山西科学技术出版社,2016:76-82.
[16] 白玉宝,孙冬胜.离石断裂带构造特征及演化[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):77-80.
[17] 肖媛媛,任战利,秦江锋,等.山西临县紫金山碱性杂岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].地质论评,2007,53(5):656-663.
[18] 王亚莹,蔡剑辉,阎国翰,等.山西临县紫金山岩体地球化学、矿物学特征及岩体成因[J].现代地质,2015,29(4):896-911.
[19] 霍腾飞,杨德彬,师江朋,等.华北地块中部早白垩世富碱侵入岩的成因:锆石U-Pb年代学和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素制约[J].岩石学报,2016,32(3):697-712.
[20] 齐钥,徐鸿博,张竞雄,等.临汾断陷盆地孤峰山花岗闪长岩的地球化学和年代学及其地质意义[J].地质论评,2011,57(4):565-573.
[21] 张海东,刘建朝,陈正乐,等.太行山南段平顺杂岩体成因:岩石学、年代学和地球化学证据[J].大地构造与成矿学,2014,38(2):454-471.
[22] 刘建朝,张海东,刘淑文,等.太行山南段平顺地区杂岩体成因研究[J].地质论评,2009,55(3):318-328.
[23] 曹代勇,关英斌.晋-获断裂带分段模式研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,1997,21(4):323-329.
[24] 吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘,2003,10(3):51-60.
[25] 翟明国,孟庆任,刘建民,等.华北东部中生代构造体制转折峰期的主要地质效应和形成动力学探讨[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):285-297.
[26] 孙金凤,杨进辉.华北东部早白垩世A型花岗岩与克拉通破坏[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2009,34(1):137-147.
[27] 陈根文,夏换,陈绍清.华北地区晚中生代重大构造转折的地质证据[J].中国地质,2008,35(6):1162-1177.
[28] Davis W M.The geographical cycle[J].Geogr J,1899,14(5):481-504.
[29] Hack J T.Dynamic equilibrium and landscape evolution[J].Theor Landform Evol,1975,1:87-102.
[30] Penck W.Morphological Analysis of Iandforms[M].New York:St.Martin’s Press,1953.
[31] 曹现志. 华北地块中部中新生代构造地貌演变过程与机制[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2014.
[32] 孟元库,汪新文,李波,等.华北克拉通中部沁水盆地热演化史与山西高原中新生代岩石圈构造演化[J].西北地质,2015,48(2):159-168.
[33] 吴忱. 华北地貌环境及其形成演化[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[34] 郑德顺,胡斌,吴智平,等.华北东部地区中、新生代地形演化关键时期古地理分析[C]//第十届全国古地理学及沉积学学术会议论文摘要集.成都:中国矿物岩石地球化学学会岩相古地理专业委员会,2008.
[35] 李三忠,张国伟,周立宏,等.中、新生代超级汇聚背景下的陆内差异变形:华北伸展裂解和华南挤压逆冲[J].地学前缘,2011,18(3):79-107.
[36] 张旗,王元龙,金惟俊,等.晚中生代的中国东部高原:证据、问题和启示[J].地质通报,2008,27(9):1404-1430.
[37] 张岳桥,廖昌珍.晚中生代—新生代构造体制转换与鄂尔多斯盆地改造[J].中国地质,2006,33(1):28-40.
[38] 魏春光,周建勋,何雨丹.岩石强度对冲断层形成特征影响的砂箱实验研究[J].地学前缘,2004,11(4):559-565.
[39] 邓宾,赵高平,万元博,等.褶皱冲断带构造砂箱物理模型研究进展[J].大地构造与成矿学,2016,40(3):446-464.
[40] Yamato P,Kaus B J P,Mouthereau F,et al.Dynamic constraints on the crustal-scale rheology of the Zagros fold belt,Iran[J].Geology,2011,39(9):815-818.
[41] Rossi D,Storti F.New artificial granular materials for analogue laboratory experiments:aluminium and siliceous microspheres[J].J Struct Geol,2003,25(11):1893-1899.
[42] 徐开礼,朱志澄.构造地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1984:42-54.
[43] 张国伟,郭安林,董云鹏,等.大陆地质与大陆构造和大陆动力学[J].地学前缘,2011,18(3):1-12.
[44] 漆家福,雷刚林,李明刚,等.库车坳陷—南天山盆山过渡带的收缩构造变形模式[J].地学前缘,2009,16(3):120-128.
[45] 漆家福,李勇,吴超,等.塔里木盆地库车坳陷收缩构造变形模型若干问题的讨论[J].中国地质,2013,40(1):106-120.
[46] 吴智平,侯旭波,李伟.华北东部地区中生代盆地格局及演化过程探讨[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(4):385-399.
[47] 牛树银,许传诗,国连杰,等.太行山变质核杂岩的特征及成因探讨[J].河北地质学院学报,1994,17(1):43-53.
[48] 宋鸿林. 平衡剖面及其地质意义[J].地质科技情报,1985,4(1):18-28.
[49] 张长厚,李程明,邓洪菱,等.燕山—太行山北段中生代收缩变形与华北克拉通破坏[J].中国科学:地球科学,2011,41(5):593-617.
[50] 魏文博,叶高峰,金胜,等.华北地区东部岩石圈导电性结构研究——减薄的华北岩石圈特点[J].地学前缘,2008,15(4):204-216.