|
|
Development characteristics and connectivity analysis of Buquan underground river in Guangxi Province |
ZHANG Qinjun1, ZHANG Yanian2, BEI Weichang1 |
1. Guangxi Geological Survey Institute, Nanning 530007, China; 2. Changjiang Institute of Survey Technical Research, Wuhan 430000, China |
|
|
Abstract To detect the karst development characteristics and distribution, long-term groundwater level was observed and groundwater tracer test was conducted based on the integrated 1:50 000 hydrogeological surveys in Buquan underground river of Guangxi Province. Surface and underground karst development chracteristics were summarized, and the connectivity of branches in the upstream and midstream of Buquan underground river was analyzed. The results show that this area is mainly peak cluster and depression landform with strong corrosion. The branch distribution of the underground river is along with faults, with dendritic planar form and ladder-shape profile form. Groundwater level has hysteretic response to precipitation in Buquan midstream and downstream, while it has sensitive response to precipitation in the upstream and the areas away form karst pipeline. The average flow rates are 1 166 m/d and 1 079 m/d for the upstream and midstream respectively, indicating fast groundwater flow. And groundwater in the Buquan upstream has larger hydraulic gradient than that in the midstream. Besides, the upstream has more river branches, suggesting complex groundwater connection. Pipelines in the midstream are clear and show better connectivity.
|
Received: 29 September 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 刘仙,蒋勇军,况明生,等.西南岩溶石漠化区水土保持研究新进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2009,21(2):20-23. [2] 袁道先. 对南方岩溶石山地区地下水资源及生态环境地质调查的一些意见[J].中国岩溶,2000,19(2):103-108. [3] 夏日元,蒋忠诚,邹胜章,等.岩溶地区水文地质环境地质综合调查工程进展[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(1):1-10. [4] 袁道先. 西南岩溶石山地区重大环境地质问题及对策研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2014:3-4. [5] 李阳兵,谢德体,魏朝富,等.西南岩溶山地生态脆弱性研究[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(1):25-29. [6] 苑涛,贾亚男.中国西南岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(32):175-180. [7] Green R T,Painter S L,Sun A,et al.Groundwater contamination in karst terranes[J].Water Air Soil Pollut Focus,2006,6(1/2):157-170. [8] Jiang Y J,Wu Y X,Groves C,et al.Natural and anthropogenic factors affecting the groundwater quality in the Nandong karst underground river system in Yunan,China[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2009,109(1/2/3/4):49-61. [9] Jiang Y J,Yan J.Effects of land use on hydrochemistry and contamination of karst groundwater from Nandong underground river system,China[J].Water Air Soil Pollut,2010,210(1/2/3/4):123-141. [10] Jiang Y J,Wu Y X,Yuan D X.Human impacts on karst ground-water contamination deduced by coupled nitrogen with strontium isotopes in the Nandong underground river system in Yunan,China[J].Environ Sci Technol,2009,43(20):7676-7683. [11] 黄之巍. 广西灵水岩溶大泉水文地质条件[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(5):74-81. [12] 黄春阳,辛晓东.布泉地下河系统特征及内涝成因[J].南方国土资源,2017(4):32-35. |
[1] |
JIN Baozhen, YANG Yunxiao, QIU Jingwei, TIAN Xinmin, JIA Zhi. Research on karst fissure development pattern of the Ordovician buried hills in Tianjin[J]. , 2019, 6(2): 94-99. |
[2] |
HE Shuorong, XIN Weidong, KANG Zhiqiang, BEI Weichang. Quantitative tracer test and analysis of the underground river system in Hebao of Hezhou City[J]. , 2019, 6(1): 81-85. |
[3] |
ZHAO Jichu, KANG Fengxin. Comprehensive evaluation of geothermal resources and generating potential of fissure karstic geothermal reserovir at Gudao buried hill uplift area in Shandong Province[J]. , 2019, 6(1): 10-16. |
[4] |
ZHANG Hailin, WANG Zhong, PANG Wei, TENG Yue, QI Huan. Using sulfur and oxygen isotope to trace the source of sulphate in Baotuquan spring area of Jinan[J]. , 2019, 6(1): 75-80. |
[5] |
CAO Chuanghua, XU Dingfang, KANG Fangping, WEN Wufei, YIN Ou, DENG Zhuan. Electrical characteristics and tectonic framework of typical karst zone in Yuejiaqiao area of Hunan Province[J]. , 2018, 5(6): 68-74. |
[6] |
CAO Jianhua, YANG Hui, ZHANG Chunlai, WU Xia, BAI Bing, HUANG Fen. Characteristics of structure and material cycling of the karst critical zone in Southwest China[J]. , 2018, 5(5): 1-12. |
|
|
|
|