|
|
Research on water quality evaluation of the Houzi River in the pyrite mining area of the Hanjiang River Basin |
DAI Zhenwei1,2, WANG Lei1,2, HE Xiaohei3, 4, FU Yongpeng1,2, PAN Wei1,2, ZHANG Yu1,2 |
1. Wuhan Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, China; 2. Central South China Innovation Center for Geosciences, Wuhan 430205, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Resources and Environment, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China; 4. School of Water Resources & Environmental Engineering, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to find out the water pollution extent in different areas of Houzi River, water samples were collected from four typical river sections of the tributary, and water quality analysis was carried out. The single factor evaluation method and the comprehensive water quality index method were used for evaluation and analysis. The results show, (1) the results of water quality evaluation of Houzi River in the pyrite mine area based on the single factor evaluation method are all inferior V class water with no difference. Nevertheless, the comprehensive water quality index method is used to evaluate the water quality of Houzi River in the four sections HZ001, HZ002, HZ003 and HZ004, from near to far of the pyrite mining area, and the comprehensive water quality index is gradually decreasing. And the corresponding categories are inferior V with black odor, inferior V but without black odor, class IV, class III respectively. All these results are in line with the actual situation based on the site investigation, which can really reflect that the water quality is becoming better with the increasing distance from the source of pollution. (2) The comprehensive water quality index method can objectively reflect the comprehensive water quality category of each section in the same river, the different pollution levels in the same water quality category, and the comparison with the water environment functional area category. And this method can also achieve the fine division of the pollution degree of inferior V water quality, which is more objective, scientific and comprehensive than the single factor evaluation method. So, the comprehensive water quality index method is suitable for the study of water pollution of different river sections in heavily polluted areas such as mining areas.
|
Received: 18 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,等.中国东北松嫩平原地下水水化学特征与演变规律[J].水科学进展,2006,17(1):20-28. [2] 蓝楠,陈燕,彭泥泥.地下水资源保护立法问题研究[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2010:1-5. [3] 李思悦,张全发.对南水北调工程解决中国北方用水问题的分析[J].人民黄河,2005,27(8):28-29,43. [4] 李思悦,张全发.运用水质指数法评价南水北调中线水源地丹江口水库水质[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(3):61-68. [5] 徐祖信. 我国河流单因子水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(3):321-325. [6] 张辉,杨雄.单因子水质标识指数法在巢湖流域水质评价中的应用[J].安徽农学通报,2018,24(10):116-119,163. [7] 张宇红,胡成.单因子标识指数法在浑河抚顺段水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(6):276-279. [8] 王书锦,刘云根,侯磊.基于内梅罗指数的阳宗海湖滨湿地水环境质量评价[J].环境污染与防治,2016,38(8):6-9,14. [9] 袁政涛,金少格,张舒,等.青浦区镇村级河道水质综合污染指数评价[J].农业灾害研究,2016,6(2):58-60. [10] 徐祖信. 我国河流综合水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(4):482-488. [11] 王博,杨志强,李慧颖,等.基于模糊数学和GIS的松花江流域水环境质量评价研究[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(6):124-129. [12] Ip W C,Hu B Q,Wong H,et al.Applications of grey relational method to river environment quality evaluation in China[J].J Hydrol,2009,379(3/4):284-290. [13] 阮仕平,党志良,胡晓寒,等.人工神经网络在综合水质评价中的应用[J].水资源研究,1997,25(2):21-23. [14] Parinet B,Lhote A,Legube B.Principal component analysis:an appropriate tool for water quality evaluation and management-application to a tropical lake system[J].Ecol Model,2004,178(3/4):295-311. [15] 尹海龙,徐祖信.我国单因子水质评价方法改进探讨[J].净化技术,2008,27(2):1-3. [16] 中国环境科学研究院.GB 3838—2002地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002. |
|
|
|