|
|
Main progress and achievements of marine geological survey in Hainan Province |
TONG Changliang1,2, SUN Longfei1,2, HUANG Shirui1,2 |
1. Marine Geological Institute of Hainan Province, Haikou 570206, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Marine Geology Resources and Environment of Hainan Province, Haikou 570206, China |
|
|
Abstract Hainan Province has made great progress in marine geological survey with the cooperation of the central and local governments. In order to further improve the effects of marine geological work in Hainan Province, the authors have reviewed the main progress of marine geological survey carried out in recent years, including four parts of marine geological survey, coastal zone survey, marine sand survey and island survey. 1∶1,000,000 scale marine geological survey has covered the whole South China Sea, and 3 sheets of 1∶250,000 marine geological survey have been carried out. The coastal zone and bay geological surveys have been carried out, and the general geological situation in less than 20 m depth coastal sea around Hainan Island has been identified. The survey scale of key coastal sections could reach 1∶50,000, and the geological resources and environmental conditions of the coastal zone have been systematically combed out. The investigation of marine sand resources mainly aims at zirconium-titanium sand ore and marine sand resources for construction, and the sediment types and distribution of marine sand potential in the shelf area around Hainan Island have been preliminarily identified. The areas with good deposit conditions have been investigated in detail, and a number of areas for development of marine sand resource have been found out. The offshore islands research mainly focused on the basic geological conditions, and based on current development and utilization status, some suggestions were put forward. A comprehensive land and sea geological survey of the Xisha Islands has been systematically carried out for the first time, a large number of basic geological data with a large scale have been obtained, and the formation and evolution process of these islands has been studied to provide reference for the island construction. Through geological work, plenty of basic marine geological data in Hainan Province have been obtained, and the marine resources and environment condition have been identified, which provides reliable geological support for the marine economic development of Hainan Province.
|
Received: 01 March 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 张训华,鲁静,印萍,等.我国海岸带地质工作面临的形势与任务[J].海洋地质前沿,2011,27(1):1-7,41. [2] 张训华,孙晓明,印萍,等.推进海岸带综合地质调查,为社会经济持续发展提供支撑[J].海洋地质前沿,2015,31(1):1-8. [3] 刘大文. “一带一路”地质调查工作刍议[J].中国地质,2015,42(4):819-827. [4] 夏小明. 海南省海洋资源环境状况[M].北京:海洋出版社,2015:1-35. [5] 刘昭蜀,赵焕庭,范时清,等.南海地质[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:1-12. [6] 仝长亮,汪贵锋,易春燕,等.海南省海洋油气资源勘探开发现状与产业发展对策[J].中国矿业,2018,27(10):70-74. [7] 王颖. 海南岛海岸环境特征[J].海洋地质动态,2002,18(3):1-9. [8] 杨克红,赵建如,金路,等.海南岛海岸带主要地质灾害类型分析[J].海洋地质动态,2010,26(6):1-6. [9] 仝长亮,潘燕俊,朱钰.海南省海岸带地质工作现状及发展建议[J].国土资源情报,2018(6):7-11,23. [10] 许东禹. 浅议我国海洋地质工作[J].中国地质,1999(3):12-14. [11] 寿嘉华. 我国海洋地质工作发展战略[J].地质通报,2002,21(12):803-806. [12] 夏真,林进清,郑志昌,等.珠江三角洲近岸海洋地质环境与地质灾害调查主要进展及成果[J].中国地质调查,2014,1(2):51-57. [13] 夏真,林进清,郑志昌,等.北部湾广西海岸带地质环境综合监测进展及成果[J].中国地质调查,2016,3(1):52-57. [14] 万世明,李安春,Stuut L B W,等.南海北部ODP1146站粒度揭示的近20 Ma以来东亚季风演化[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2007,37(6):761-770. [15] 林间,徐敏,周志远,等.全球俯冲带大洋钻探进展与启示[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(12):1253-1266. [16] 夏真,林进清,郑志昌.海岸带海洋地质环境综合调查方法[J].地质通报,2005,24(6):570-575. [17] 邱燕,彭学超,朱本铎,等.南海1∶100万永暑礁幅海洋区域地质调查成果[J].地质通报,2006,25(3):419-425. [18] 陈泓君,彭学超,朱本铎,等.南海1∶100万海南岛幅海洋区域地质调查与编图成果综述[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2014,34(6):83-96. [19] 莫杰,王文海,彭娜娜,等.我国海洋地质调查研究新进展[J].中国地质调查,2017,4(4):1-8. [20] 罗伟东,孙桂华,黄文凯.1∶25万乐东幅区域地质调查[J].中国地质调查成果快讯,2018,4(27):13-15. [21] 黄长生,王芳婷,黎清华,等.泛珠三角地区地质环境综合调查工程进展[J].中国地质调查,2018,5(3):1-10. [22] 何海军,甘华阳,夏真,等.华南西部滨海湿地调查及主要成果[J].中国地质调查,2018,5(6):75-82. [23] 黎兵,王寒梅,史玉金.海岸带地质工作中陆海统筹的方法论探讨[J].中国地质调查,2018,5(4):76-80. [24] 杨静,张仁铎,翁士创,等.海岸带环境承载力评价方法研究[J].中国环境科学,2013,33(S1):178-185. [25] 龙根元,李亮,张匡华,等.海南岛海岸带综合地质调查与评价成果报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2017. [26] 潘燕俊,崔汝勇,林明坤,等.海南岛周边浅海砂矿资源潜力浅析[J].海洋通报,2017,36(4):458-467. [27] 陈飞,张匡华,傅人康,等.海南岛东部陵水—文昌近浅海锆钛砂矿资源预查-普查报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2014. [28] 仝长亮. 海南岛海砂资源的分类特征及成矿特点分析[J].中国地质调查,2018,5(3):74-80. [29] 罗昆,刘刚,薛玉龙,等.利用单道地震反射数据预测海南岛东部近海砂层分布[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2017,37(1):125-130. [30] 仝长亮,陈飞,傅人康,等.海南岛北部海砂资源调查评价报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2016. [31] 仝长亮,黎刚,陈飞,等.海南岛东北部海域海砂资源特征及成因[J].海洋地质前沿,2018,34(1):12-19. [32] 陈飞,宋佳伟,傅人康,等.南海固体矿产资源潜力调查评价报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2017. [33] 海南省海洋厅,海南省海岛资源综合调查领导小组办公室.海南省海岛资源综合调查研究报告[M].北京:海洋出版社,1996. [34] 陈志华,李朝新,王春娟,等.海南省海岛(岛礁)综合调查调查研究报告[R].青岛:国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,2011. [35] 薛玉龙,李香,李华彦,等.海南岛周边岛屿地质及矿产资源综合调查与评价报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2012. [36] 刘刚,王雪木,付标,等.海南省三沙市重点岛礁综合地质调查与评价成果报告[R].海口:海南省海洋地质调查研究院,2017. [37] 李学杰,王大伟,吴时国,等.三沙海底峡谷识别与地貌特征分析[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2017,37(3):28-36. [38] 杨朝云,韩孝辉,罗昆,等.西沙群岛宣德环礁的地震层序发育特征[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2018,38(6):25-36. |
[1] |
TIE Yongbo, XU Yong, ZHANG Yong, WEI Yunjie, YANG Xiuyuan, ZHANG Taili, TAN Jianmin. Main progresses and achievements of geological hazards survey in hilly area of southern China[J]. , 2020, 7(2): 1-12. |
[2] |
ZHAO Xingyuezi, PENG Ke, XIAO Pan, HE Jun, CHENG Gang, DENG Birong. Suitability evaluation and geological suggestions of the bridge construction sites along the middle reaches of Yangtze River[J]. , 2019, 6(5): 99-106. |
[3] |
ZHOU Xingui, DU Zhili. Progress and achievements in oil and gas geological survey and exploration of new strata in new area of Northern China[J]. , 2019, 6(4): 1-10. |
[4] |
MO Jie, WANG Wenhai, PENG Nana, XU Chengde, ZHANG Deyu. New progresses on marine geological survey-research in China[J]. , 2017, 4(4): 1-8. |
[5] |
DENG Jun, CHEN Yue, HUANG Hong-wei, LIANG Yu-ping, HE Hai-zhou, CHEN Sheng,WU Tian-sheng, YANG Zhi-qiang, WEI Fang, LUO Li-ying. Main Progress and Achievements of Bauxite Mineral Prospective Survey Project of Fusui-Chongzuo District,Guangxi[J]. , 2015, 2(4): 8-12. |
[6] |
GENG Quan-ru, MAO Xiao-chang, ZHANG Zhang, PENG Zhi-min, GUAN Jun-lei. New Understanding in the Middle and West Part of Bangong Lake-Nujiang River Metallogenic Belt and Its lmplication for Prospecting[J]. , 2015, 2(2): 1-11. |
|
|
|
|