|
|
|
| Main progress and achievements of the geological survey project of Sichuan-Tibet Railway traffic corridor |
| GUO Changbao1, 2, WANG Baodi3, LIU Jiankang4, TU Jienan5, ZHANG Yongshuang6, MA Jianfei6, TIE Yongbo3, HAN Bing7, MA Xin8, LIU Feng5, LI Xue1, 2, MENG Wen1, 2, ZHONG Ning1, 2, YANG Zhihua1, 2, WU Ruian1, 2 |
1. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Geo-hazard, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China;
4. Institute of Exploration Technology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Chengdu 611734, China;
5. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Nature Resources, Beijing 100083, China;
6. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050000, China;
7. China Institute of Geo-environment Monitoring, Beijing 100037, China;
8. Center for Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, China Geological Survey, Baoding 071051, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Sichuan-Tibet Railway is a key project planned and constructed in China. It is located in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau where the terrain, geomorphology and tectonic activity are extremely complex. There are a series of serious geological problems that need to be solved urgently in its planning and construction period, such as regional active faults with their disaster effects, high geostress with resulted rockburst and large deformation, geological hazards, high temperature with heat damage, high pressure water and mud inrush in fault zone, stability of high and steep slope. In order to support the needs of technical support for the planning and construction of Sichuan-Tibet Railway and to accurately serve the implementation of major national strategies, China Geological Survey has deployed the Geological Survey Project of Sichuan-Tibet Railway Traffic Corridor,which is focused on the key issues restricting the planning and construction of Sichuan-Tibet Railway, and plays an important role in the planning and construction of major national projects. In 2019, it mainly completed 1 350 km2 of 1:50 000 regional geological survey, and 5 000 km2 of 1:50 000 geological hazard survey. six geothermal flow geological parameter wells and etght earth temperature monitoring stations were also constructed. Twehty geostress measurement holes and 11 special geological survey reports were completed. The route optimizat suggestions and disaster prevention suggestions proposed for Dadu River Bridge, Litang Station, and Maoyaba Basin were adopted. The 1:5 000 large-scale aerial geophysical technology was introduced into the survey of complex mountain railway engineering for the first time, and the directional core drilling technology for ultra-long horizontal boreholes at a kilometer level was innovated with a major breakthrough. Besides, the measurement of geostress in horizontal boreholes with a depth of 500 meters was achieved. Overall, the project has improved the degree and accuracy of geological surveys along the railway through the survey and research in 2019. And the theoretical methods of major engineering geological problems and detection technologies in complex and difficult mountainous areas, geological disaster risk prevention, control theory, and key disaster reduction technologies were innovated, which effectively supported the planning and construction of Sichuan-Tibet Railway.
|
|
Received: 08 November 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会.关于新建川藏铁路雅安至林芝段可行性研究报告批复的主要内容[EB/OL].(2020-09-29).https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/ghwb/202009/t20200930_1239951.html.
[2] Lu C F,Cai C X.Challenges and countermeasures for construction safety during the Sichuan-Tibet railway project[J].Engineering,2019,5(5):833-838.
[3] 中国国家铁路集团有限公司.习近平对川藏铁路开工建设作出重要指示强调发扬"两路"精神和青藏铁路精神高质量推进工程建设[EB/OL].(2020-11-08).http://www.china-railway.com.cn/xwzx/ywsl/202011/t20201108_110244.html.
[4] 朱颖. 川藏铁路建设的挑战与对策[M].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2017.
[5] Tapponnier P,Molnar P.Active faulting and tectonics in China[J].J Geophys Res,1977,82(20):2905-2930.
[6] 朱守彪,石耀霖.青藏高原地形扩展力以及下地壳对上地壳的拖曳力的遗传有限单元法反演[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):225-234.
[7] 徐纪人,赵志新.青藏高原及其周围地区区域应力场与构造运动特征[J].中国地质,2006,33(2):275-285.
[8] 谢富仁,崔效锋,赵建涛,等.中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J].地球物理学报,2004,47(4):654-662.
[9] Meng W,Guo C B,Zhang Y S,et al.In situ stress measurements in the Lhasa Terrane,Tibetan Plateau,China[J].Acta Geol Sin,2016,90(6):2022-2035.
[10] 宋章,张广泽,蒋良文,等.川藏铁路主要地质灾害特征及地质选线探析[J].铁道标准设计,2016,60(1):14-19.
[11] 郭长宝,张永双,蒋良文,等.川藏铁路沿线及邻区环境工程地质问题概论[J].现代地质,2017,31(5):877-889.
[12] Guo C B,Zhang Y S,Montgomery D R,et al.How unusual is the long-runout of the earthquake-triggered giant Luanshibao landslide,Tibetan Plateau,China?[J].Geomorphology,2016,259:145-154.
[13] Dai Z L,Wang F W,Cheng Q G,et al.A giant historical landslide on the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J].Bull Eng Geol Environ,2018,78(3):2055-2068.
[14] Zeng Q L,Yuan G X,Davies T,et al.10Be dating and seismic origin of Luanshibao rock avalanche in SE Tibetan Plateau and implications on Litang active fault[J].Landslides,2020,17(5):1091-1104.
[15] 许强,郑光,李为乐,等.2018年10月和11月金沙江白格两次滑坡-堰塞堵江事件分析研究[J].工程地质学报,2018,26(6):1534-1551.
[16] 王立朝,温铭生,冯振,等.中国西藏金沙江白格滑坡灾害研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(1):1-9.
[17] Zhang S L,Yin Y P,Hu X W,et al.Initiation mechanism of the Baige landslide on the upper reaches of the Jinsha River,China[J].Landslides,2020,17(12):2865-2877.
[18] Hu Y X,Yu Z Y,Zhou J W.Numerical simulation of landslide-generated waves during the 11 October 2018 Baige landslide at the Jinsha River[J].Landslides,2020,17(10):2317-2328.
[19] Fan X M,Yang F,Subramanian S S,et al.Prediction of a multi-hazard chain by an integrated numerical simulation approach:the Baige landslide,Jinsha River,China[J].Landslides,2020,17(1):147-164.
[20] 殷跃平. 西藏波密易贡高速巨型滑坡特征及减灾研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2000,27(4):8-11.
[21] Delaney K B,Evans S G.The 2000 Yigong landslide (Tibetan Plateau),rockslide-dammed lake and outburst flood:review,remote sensing analysis,and process modelling[J].Geomorphology,2015,246:377-393.
[22] 戴兴建,殷跃平,邢爱国.易贡滑坡-碎屑流-堰塞坝溃坝链生灾害全过程模拟与动态特征分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2019,30(5):1-8.
[23] Guo C B,Montgomery D R,Zhang Y S,et al.Evidence for repeated failure of the giant Yigong landslide on the edge of the Tibetan Plateau[J].Sci Rep,2020,10(1):14371.
[24] 吴瑞安,张永双,郭长宝,等.西藏加查拉岗村巨型古滑坡发育特征与形成机理研究[J].地质学报,2018,92(6):1324-1334.
[25] 潘桂棠,徐耀荣,王培生,等.青藏高原东部边缘新生代构造[J].青藏高原地质文集,1983(4):129-142.
[26] 潘桂棠,刘宇平,郑来林,等.青藏高原碰撞构造与效应[M].广州:广东科技出版社,2013:1-466.
[27] 王立全,潘桂棠,丁俊,等.青藏高原及邻区地质图及说明书(1:1 500 000)[M].北京:地质出版社,2013:1-88.
[28] 潘桂棠,任飞,尹福光,等.洋板块地质与川藏铁路工程地质关键区带[J].地球科学,2020,45(7):2293-2304.
[29] 刘峰,马剑飞,魏帅超.地热调查有效服务川藏铁路规划建设[J].中国地质调查成果快讯,2020,6:6-9. |
| [1] |
ZHAO Yong. Exploration of the technology and method of 1:50 000 regional geological survey in proluvial and alluvial plain[J]. , 2021, 8(1): 60-70. |
| [2] |
YANG Xiuyuan, FU Jie, HAN Xudong, ZHANG Chao, PAN Shuhua, LI Gang, GUO Yingping, PAN Jianyong. Progress of geological hazards survey in the urban area from Wanzhou to Wushan in the Three Gorges Reservoir[J]. , 2021, 8(1): 97-107. |
| [3] |
DONG Yibing, YU Wen, ZHANG Zhongfu. Susceptibility zoning of geological disasters based on GIS: A case of Huining area in Gansu Province[J]. , 2020, 7(3): 89-95. |
| [4] |
WANG Yafei, LIU Lili, LIU Jiayun, LIU Jun. Discussion on the revision method of 1:50 000 regional geological survey achievement maps: Take the revision of 39 regional geological survey maps of Anhui Province as an example[J]. , 2020, 7(2): 65-71. |
| [5] |
LIU Teng, REN Guangming, WANG Meng, YU Tianbin. Suitability evaluation of rural residential areas under the threat of geological disasters:A case study in Yinchanggou watershed of Pengzhou City[J]. , 2020, 7(2): 95-100. |
| [6] |
TIE Yongbo, XU Yong, ZHANG Yong, WEI Yunjie, YANG Xiuyuan, ZHANG Taili, TAN Jianmin. Main progresses and achievements of geological hazards survey in hilly area of southern China[J]. , 2020, 7(2): 1-12. |
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 7 
